What's new
L-MOUNT Forum

Register a free account now!

If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.

*** October 2024 Image and Video Thread ***

Oíche said:
Sunday's storm "Ashley" in 4k so make sure to select 4k in settings - quality and a big screen like my 48" OLED :D

First time using iMovies software, little 8GB M1 Mac mini is a power house for stitching all of these together then transcoding.

I enjoyed filming the storm plus a few stills, S5ii & 24-105 f4 are still covered in sea salt :cool:

Landscape colour profile, originally filmed in c4k 422 25p...

Click to expand...

Really loved it. Felt like being there in the storm. I didn't understand the covered in salt part until near the end of the movie :) I'm not sure if I would have taken those nice shots where the water covers those ships. And I clicked the movie on the first place because of the tank in the shot :cool:. The entrance of the army base at my work also houses a museum. So I pass those things all the time. Actually in front of my office is a garage for armoured vehicles which look like tanks. (these). And just the sound of those engines.... love it. Ofcourse for security reasons I'm not allowed to film/photograh at the base.
 
RuleOfThirds said:
Really loved it. Felt like being there in the storm. I didn't understand the covered in salt part until near the end of the movie :) I'm not sure if I would have taken those nice shots where the water covers those ships. And I clicked the movie on the first place because of the tank in the shot :cool:. The entrance of the army base at my work also houses a museum. So I pass those things all the time. Actually in front of my office is a garage for armoured vehicles which look like tanks. (these). And just the sound of those engines.... love it. Ofcourse for security reasons I'm not allowed to film/photograh at the base.
Click to expand...
I found it strange to only find about 5 YT Ireland videos of this storm. I was dumbfounded to see a completely shitty shaky phone video with zero attempt at good skills, for example, a horizon possibly 30° off level etc with nattering getting 12k views? It was so bad I couldn't watch it as the content was equally bad.

I'm fully aware mine was possibly boring for some but at least there was relatively some attempt of craft in it to get what... 28 views? :rolleyes:

Another of Dublin airport was over 100k views or something and I could only watch 1 plane landing and it was 8 hours long?

I'm not bothered but maybe most people need nattering? I'm the polar opposite and detest it. I want to hear the storm and not the narcissistic YouTuber narrative so... 1000021121.jpg
 
I gave up years ago trying to understand the correlation between “likes” and quality of content. On Flickr there are some photographers with breathtaking images but who garner just a handful of “faves”, but others whose content is basically crap who get hundreds of “faves” as well as gushing comments. Makes no sense at all.
 
pdk42 said:
I gave up years ago trying to understand the correlation between “likes” and quality of content. On Flickr there are some photographers with breathtaking images but who garner just a handful of “faves”, but others whose content is basically crap who get hundreds of “faves” as well as gushing comments. Makes no sense at all.
Click to expand...
I agree, Paul. Some photographers deserve more likes. I think it is about how to share the photos. Flickr is a huge platform to share images. 25 million photos everyday:

thesmallbusinessblog.com

Flickr Statistics 2024: How Many People Use Flickr?

Key Flickr Statistics 100 million registered photographers use Flickr25 million photos were uploaded in Flickr in a day People from 63 countries have been using FlickrMore than 10 billion images shared on the Flickr platform500 million photos
thesmallbusinessblog.com thesmallbusinessblog.com

And there are people who are experts to reach the 500 photos of the daily section "Flickr Explore":

rollingspoke.com

How to get featured on Flickr Explore

I recently had my 10th photograph selected to Flickr Explore. Here is why it's a big deal and why it doesn’t matter.
rollingspoke.com rollingspoke.com

By the way, not all the photos of Explore are excelent... but, "the images on Explore are picked by an algorithm based on activity on the photo".


So, it is not only about the quality of the photo. It is about sharing the photo in the groups with more members, like Flickr social or the huge groups about landscapes, nature, portraits, etc.
 
It's about that time of the year again. Say what you want about the Lumix S 50, but I think it's a brilliant little lens. Before we even begin to consider the price
241027s-P1013909.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 50.0 mm
  • ƒ/2
  • 1/2500 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • -0.7
  • ISO 100
241027s-P1013880.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 50.0 mm
  • ƒ/2.5
  • 1/5000 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • ISO 100
241027s-P1013876.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 50.0 mm
  • ƒ/2.5
  • 1/1600 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • ISO 100
 
241027s-P1013931.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 50.0 mm
  • ƒ/2.5
  • 1/1600 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • ISO 100
241027s-P1013887.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 50.0 mm
  • ƒ/2.2
  • 1/4000 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • -0.3
  • ISO 100


This was with the S 85mm. Single shot. Wide open (I think) DFD is $h!t. Lol.

241027s-P1013894.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 85.0 mm
  • ƒ/2
  • 1/2000 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • ISO 100
 
Might not of posted here, but that doesn't mean I've not been shooting. Fun stuff I've been up to. Modifying parts to suit my own purpose.
241022s-P1013834.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 26.0 mm
  • ƒ/8
  • 1/15 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • ISO 500



241022s-P1013835.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 26.0 mm
  • ƒ/8
  • 1/15 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • -0.7
  • ISO 1000
241022s-P1013838.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 26.0 mm
  • ƒ/8
  • 1/15 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • -0.3
  • ISO 1000
 
Continued
241022s-P1013841.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 26.0 mm
  • ƒ/8
  • 1/15 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • -0.3
  • ISO 125


And the finished job.
241026s-P1013860.jpg
  • Panasonic - DC-S5
  • 85.0 mm
  • ƒ/1.8
  • 1/3200 sec
  • Pattern
  • Auto exposure
  • -0.7
  • ISO 100
 
pdk42 said:
Wow - how steep are the hills you're planning to climb ??!!!
Click to expand...
Lets put it this way. My typical after work ride is 16-17 kms long. With 220-240 meters of elevation gain. On rocks, dirt & gravel. Average speed 10-11km/hr
A few weeks back one weekend ride was 23.5 km's, with 724 meters of elevation gain. All on rocks, dirt and gravel. Average speed 9.7 km/hr. The day before was about the same distance, 454 meters of elevation gain. Average speed 10.7 km/hr. I've never yet thought to myself as I get well into a ride, hell I wish I had taller gearing for more top speed :) But I have gotten off and pushed and carried the bike a bit. Hopefully now there's a bit less pushing/walking involved.
The purpose of that exercise is simplicity, with less weight. I'm using a 10 speed cassette, with 11-48t sprocket/ratio spread. I tried a 28t front chain ring, was a tiny bit too high geared, 26t 1x narrow/wide sprockets are hard to come by here in Australia, so I modded a 2x crankset which allows me to run 22-28t 4 bolt chain rings on the smaller PCD, and are cheap as cheaps, as well as readily available anywhere, last forever, and are nice and light. And I can easily adjust the chainline to suit different bikes with different hub widths. All win.
There is method behind the madness I can assure you.
Edit -Oh, and I'm 60 in a couple of weeks time.
 
Last edited:
pdk42 said:
S5 plus Sigma 35/2.


Dusk at the Akershus, Oslo by Paul Kaye, on Flickr
Click to expand...

Nice !

You are able to use the 35mm really very well. I do not now why I do not get used to this focal lenght although it is looking great if someone else is using it. Maybe I have to force myself to use only that one 35mm lens for 2 months.

I do think that the same photo made with 28mm would not look as good. At least that is my impression. This here is the optimal compromise between "getting drawn into that image" (advantage of a 20/24/28mm) and "not squeeze too much into the image" (disadvantage of a 20/24/28mm).

I guess I have to keep my 35mm and 24mm and try to force myself to use them more. Paul, your images are not good for my financial planning...Z04 Menno
 
Last edited:
dirk said:
Nice !

You are able to use the 35mm really very well. I do not now why I do not get used to this focal lenght although it is looking great if someone else is using it. Maybe I have to force myself to use only that one 35mm lens for 2 months.

I do think that the same photo made with 28mm would not look as good. At least that is my impression. This here is the optimal compromise between "getting drawn into that image" (advantage of a 20/24/28mm) and "not squeeze too much into the image" (disadvantage of a 20/24/28mm).

I guess I have to keep my 35mm and 24mm and try to force myself to use them more. Paul, your images are not good for my financial planning...Z04 Menno
Click to expand...
I never used to like the 35mm focal length either, but I grew to really like the Oly 17mm when I was using m43 gear. I think the square crop of m43 helps somehow. You’ll see in the shot above that I’ve cropped it squarer than the 3:2 of the sensor.

Now I would be very happy to wander around with just the Sigma 35mm on the camera. It’s a fantastic lens.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top