Exactly, and the F/8 focal length for indoor video doesn't seem very ideal. The base ISO 4000 is very good, but anyway.It just doesn't seem plausible that the camera's kit lens would be MF if there is no EVF.
I would bet my house it won't be manual focus.Panasonic make a few m4/3 pancakes with AF, e.g. the 14mm f/2.5 and 20mm f/1.7 so I'd expect they could make a good inexpensive AF full frame pancake.
It just doesn't seem plausible that the camera's kit lens would be MF if there is no EVF.
I would bet my house it won't be manual focus.
Lol yeah looking at the photo that's definitely more a pancake than a bottlecap.What a bad joke! Looks the same size as an f/2.8 pancake, yet it's f/8 MF... Bodycap my @$$
I know this thing is not for me (and many around here), yet it's getting quite sad.
Looks like a 35mm format version of the excellent little m4/3 14mm f2.5 to me. Could be wrong though.oooo are you sure you would bet your house? It looks really like a F8 Manual focus lens... I understand you get it for free with the cam.
Its for people who don't have that much to spend, China & Generation Next. They first buy the camera, and when they have money again the can buy a real lens... I don't think they will sell the lens without a camera.
Might also be a 'almost no manual focus'. Set it at 2.9 meters and almost everything is in focus... If there is no motion blur ofcourse... Should be terrible in low light.
View attachment 4398
So far I’ve gone from “Wow, Panasonic are actually making an S-series rangefinder style camera” to “Blargh, a YouTok / TicTube ‘creators’ camera”, to “Is somebody deliberately deceiving the L-Rumours admin?” I really hope it’s the last one…
If it's an actual body cap lens, like the Olympus I mentioned earlier... I can actually kinda see it, the more I think about it. At least more than the lack of a viewfinder.What? Is it really an f8 28mm lens! They can’t be serious!
And they still do. The forum that won't be mentioned, even has threads started, by person's that have never owned or used the G100, just to bag the sh!t out of it. Yet Sean Robinson? from Panasonic, says it sells ridiculously well. The misery guts's from same forum then pipe up and say he's just a liar. Absolutely disgraceful behavior. Tribalism and fanboyism at its absolute worst. Hopefully the rumored new 35mm format camera doesn't suffer the same bias and outright vitriol directed towards it.Most of the camera gear reviewers and camera gear forum members panned the G100 when it was released yet Panasonic has said that it sells well and they even gave it a mild update not so long ago, so they continue to manufacture and sell them
I suspect that the new Panasonic camera will be derided by the DPR editors/reviewers because it's not a CaNikSonFuji camera and doesn't meet their standards for stills photography. "OMG it can't do BIF at a gazillion frames per second!" Or "You will have to carry a spare battery, it's the end of the world".And they still do. The forum that won't be mentioned, even has threads started, by person's that have never owned or used the G100, just to bag the sh!t out of it. Yet Sean Robinson? from Panasonic, says it sells ridiculously well. The misery guts's from same forum then pipe up and say he's just a liar. Absolutely disgraceful behavior. Tribalism and fanboyism at its absolute worst. Hopefully the rumored new 35mm format camera doesn't suffer the same bias and outright vitriol directed towards it.
But here's the problematic question to pose ...
- In what way is a compact FF camera (sans EVF) with an f8 28mm lens really any better than an m43 camera with a 14mm f2.5 lens? (f4.5 FF equiv for DOF)?
... because that latter camera is a package that's been on the market for years and there are some excellent cameras in that sector, including ones made by Panasonic (e.g. GX9, GX8, or from Olympus anything in the Pen range; plus the little Lumix 14mm f2.5). I'm totally flummoxed by what Panasonic are doing. The S series (FF) was always meant to be the high IQ, "grown up" camera
It's not. Plain & simple as that. Other than dynamic range. Rolling shutter may be worse too. But, it's not a fixed lens, it's an L mount interchangeable lens body, & there are other unreleased lenses yet to be seen.But here's the problematic question to pose ...
- In what way is a compact FF camera (sans EVF) with an f8 28mm lens really any better than an m43 camera with a 14mm f2.5 lens? (f4.5 FF equiv for DOF)?
But here's the problematic question to pose ...
- In what way is a compact FF camera (sans EVF) with an f8 28mm lens really any better than an m43 camera with a 14mm f2.5 lens? (f4.5 FF equiv for DOF)?