L-MOUNT Forum

Register a free account now!

If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.

Share your photos with legacy lenses

So, after pulling out my Sigma DG DN 45/2.8 for the first time in a while, I decided to comparison-shoot it against my well-liked Konica Hexanon 40/1.8 to see how well the adapted lens did. Both shot at f/8 on my Sigma fp.

Sigma:
53873046260_298a4b36e0_h.jpg
20240721-SDIM2071 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Konica:
53872634831_ee89322b5c_h.jpg
20240721-SDIM2077 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The Sigma had a shorter close-focusing distance than the Hexanon. But I had a lot of trouble with the autofocus on the fp, getting it to lock on to the particular flower I wanted; and even when it claimed to lock on, it didn't always focus right. It did do a bit better up closer:

Sigma:
53873072800_d8449b6ff7_h.jpg
20240721-SDIM2075 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Sigma:
53872982044_b1fff03d5c_h.jpg
20240721-SDIM2080 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Hexanon:
53872878468_06bd78d12b_h.jpg
20240721-SDIM2079 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The Sigma did much better on this one. It also has a more yellow cast than the Hexanon. And despite them both being set to f/8, with the fp on Aperture priority, the fp consistently gave the Sigma a little more exposure/slower shutter than the Hexanon.

Sigma:
53871728967_ea02aec494_h.jpg
20240721-SDIM2087 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Hexanon:
53873046235_127edb52cc_h.jpg
20240721-SDIM2089 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

I actually had better luck shooting this bumblebee with the Hexanon, despite the manual focus; the Sigma was never able to nail focus.

Hexanon:
53873046255_1552bd1aa1_h.jpg
20240721-SDIM2091 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Hexanon:
53872878463_a25da009b9_h.jpg
20240721-SDIM2092 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
 
Yesterday I received a Minolta MD 28mm f/2.8 in virtually new condition, dedicated hood and everything, though I can't properly use it as I don't currently have my SR to L adapter with me. I managed to free-lens a shot wide open at minimum focus distance using a PK to L adapter and performance looks decent. The lens is compact and light without feeling plasticky and if performance is good I can see it being a viable option for travel, though to shoot on film too I'd really need to get a later (electronic) Minolta camera as they're smaller and lighter. All my Minolta film bodies are the older mechanical SR line which are nice to use but quite big and heavy.

53892308679_b7dbe17372_c.jpg
Pink
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

Here's the lens:

53892339550_a25d4b85c3_c.jpg
Minolta MD 28mm f/2.8
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
 
Another comparison, this time my favorite Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2.5 with a newly acquired Hexanon 28/3.5:

Vivitar:
53915222816_b1a4f71d98_b.jpg
20240809-SDIM2144 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Hexanon:
53915672640_23a1f78ab6_b.jpg
20240809-SDIM2147 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Hard for me to say which one I like better... however, so far I haven't had a chance to shoot the kind of glossy/volumetric subjects that give the kind of fine tonal graduation that's made the Kiron a favorite of mine. The Hexanon's certainly doing a nice job on the flowers!

Hexanon:
53914336372_699de22c53_b.jpg
20240809-SDIM2151 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

53915222776_d8dddbeb28_h.jpg
20240809-SDIM2154 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

And not too bad a job on landscape, either:

53915222791_3233ce8131_h.jpg
20240809-SDIM2169 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
 
Yes Pentax is dead Z04 Kaputtlachen

It seems that you suffered a lot in your old Pentax time. See it more positive. Pentax has still some great lenses and cameras. It is just not the right tool for you right now ;)
 
It seems that you suffered a lot in your old Pentax time. See it more positive. Pentax has still some great lenses and cameras. It is just not the right tool for you right now ;)
Fsake it was a joke i.e the photos Z04 Smileys26
 
Back
Top