Share your photos with legacy lenses

[Travis Butler]

So, after pulling out my Sigma DG DN 45/2.8 for the first time in a while, I decided to comparison-shoot it against my well-liked Konica Hexanon 40/1.8 to see how well the adapted lens did. Both shot at f/8 on my Sigma fp.

Sigma:

20240721-SDIM2071 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Konica:

20240721-SDIM2077 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The Sigma had a shorter close-focusing distance than the Hexanon. But I had a lot of trouble with the autofocus on the fp, getting it to lock on to the particular flower I wanted; and even when it claimed to lock on, it didn't always focus right. It did do a bit better up closer:

Sigma:

20240721-SDIM2075 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Sigma:

20240721-SDIM2080 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Hexanon:

20240721-SDIM2079 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The Sigma did much better on this one. It also has a more yellow cast than the Hexanon. And despite them both being set to f/8, with the fp on Aperture priority, the fp consistently gave the Sigma a little more exposure/slower shutter than the Hexanon.

Sigma:

20240721-SDIM2087 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Hexanon:

20240721-SDIM2089 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

I actually had better luck shooting this bumblebee with the Hexanon, despite the manual focus; the Sigma was never able to nail focus.

Hexanon:

20240721-SDIM2091 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Hexanon:

20240721-SDIM2092 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

 

[Jonathan-Mac]

A few shots from the Pentax M 50mm f/1.7 last week


By the sea by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Chair by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Beach greenery by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

 

[Jonathan-Mac]

Yesterday I received a Minolta MD 28mm f/2.8 in virtually new condition, dedicated hood and everything, though I can't properly use it as I don't currently have my SR to L adapter with me. I managed to free-lens a shot wide open at minimum focus distance using a PK to L adapter and performance looks decent. The lens is compact and light without feeling plasticky and if performance is good I can see it being a viable option for travel, though to shoot on film too I'd really need to get a later (electronic) Minolta camera as they're smaller and lighter. All my Minolta film bodies are the older mechanical SR line which are nice to use but quite big and heavy.


Pink by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

Here's the lens:


Minolta MD 28mm f/2.8 by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

 

[Jonathan-Mac]

A change in focus with the Pentax K 28mm f/2


01244699 by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


01244702 by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

 

[Travis Butler]

Another comparison, this time my favorite Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2.5 with a newly acquired Hexanon 28/3.5:

Vivitar:

20240809-SDIM2144 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Hexanon:

20240809-SDIM2147 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Hard for me to say which one I like better... however, so far I haven't had a chance to shoot the kind of glossy/volumetric subjects that give the kind of fine tonal graduation that's made the Kiron a favorite of mine. The Hexanon's certainly doing a nice job on the flowers!

Hexanon:

20240809-SDIM2151 by Travis Butler, on Flickr


20240809-SDIM2154 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

And not too bad a job on landscape, either:


20240809-SDIM2169 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

 

[Jonathan-Mac]

A couple of golden hour photos with the Pentax SMC Takumar 200mm f/4 on the S5


Golden evening by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Low sun by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

 

[Jonathan-Mac]

Some close-ups wide open with the new-to-me Pentax A 28mm f/2. This is all I've done with it since I got it unfortunately.


Flowers by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Flowers II by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Flowers III by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

 

[Travis Butler]

A couple from last night's Saturn viewing at Union Station:


20240906-SDIM2702 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Sigma fp, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8


20240906-SDIM2715 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Konica Hexanon 28/3.5

Still not sure which one I like better. The first one has a lot less clutter, but the second one catches the full contents of the central arches.

 

[Jonathan-Mac]

A few in Edinburgh with the SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8


Flowers by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Cult coffee by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Sunshine reader by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Graveside flowers by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

 

[Jonathan-Mac]

Konica 50mm f/1.7 wide open - nice and sharp in the centre and crazy bokeh!


Green conkers, green leaves, green bokeh by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Chalk by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

And the main reason for owning Konica Hexanon lenses - crazy flare! Konica 40mm f/1.8


Evening flare by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

 

[Jonathan-Mac]

Yesterday's sunrise with the Pentax "K" 200mm f/2.5


Sunrise over tower blocks by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

 

[Jonathan-Mac]

Takumar 35mm f/3.5


Windows & wall by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

Takumar 55mm f/1.8


Alien face by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

 

[Jonathan-Mac]

With the Pentax M 50mm f/1.7


A white grave by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


An iron grave by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


A simple grave by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

 

[Oíche]

With the Pentax M 50mm f/1.7

View attachment 7751
A white grave by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

View attachment 7752
An iron grave by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

View attachment 7753
A simple grave by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

Yes Pentax is dead

 

[dirk]

Yes Pentax is dead

It seems that you suffered a lot in your old Pentax time. See it more positive. Pentax has still some great lenses and cameras. It is just not the right tool for you right now

 

[Oíche]

It seems that you suffered a lot in your old Pentax time. See it more positive. Pentax has still some great lenses and cameras. It is just not the right tool for you right now

Fsake it was a joke i.e the photos