pdk42
Moderator
Yes, that’s the conclusion I’m coming to. I think I’ll pass on the 28-200. I’m in Scotland at the moment and finding that the 14-28 + 24-105 are both great lenses that perform really well and cover most of the range I need. I’ve got the 70-300 too and actually that’s a great performer as well. I can take the extra weight for the time being!I think it's clear that this lens is not a magic bullet - image quality will not be up to exacting standards for sharpness, such as often desired for landscapes, not to mention flare. We can't disregard the "rule" that super-zooms sacrifice significant image quality for their high zoom ratios and small size. This may be the newest super-zoom on the market and it may be better than many others but it's still a super-zoom with all the limitations that implies.
Last edited: