Lumix 28–200mm f/4–7.1 Sample Images

[Travis Butler]

There’s a way to measure sharpness objectively on an optical bench - it’s called the MTF and acuity values are measured in line pairs per millimetre. Not sure how big a standard tack is, but if we really want to be objective in measuring lens performance, we need an optical bench and a machine to measure the MTF.

And even that just measures resolution; a lens can have high resolution and not appear sharp because the tonal rendering doesn't highlight the edges. Using something like the Clarity tool or the Dynamic Contrast filter can make an image appear much sharper without changing the actual resolution.

 

[Oíche]

I don't see the point in comparing it to 24-105, 70-300, 70-200 f4 pro etc. etc.

It is as best as a 24-200 can be in this weight and size and should be commended. I love the images and video posted from it.

The snarpness debate for me is totally boring. Almost every sharpness freak I've ever seen on the internet does not produce interesting photography... "Look at my sharp leaf"... Anybody can do this and want you to be impressed

 

[inkoherence]

I love the versatility of this lens. .

• Panasonic - DC-S5
• LUMIX S 28-200/F4-7.1
• 199.0 mm
• ƒ/9
• 1/500 sec
• Pattern
• Manual exposure
• ISO 640

No edits (other than a crop), Standard profile from S5. 200mm at f9.

 

[Oíche]

I love the versatility of this lens. .
View attachment 7682
No edits (other than a crop), Standard profile from S5. 200mm at f9.

I seen great flower macros with it also on dpreview, It seems very popular