I like this 65:24 a lot!Anchored in storm off Blackhead Lighthouse, Belfast Lough entrance.View attachment 3405
Thanks, true 65:24 is not an available aspect ratio in LR mobile and you cannot add it manually in custom mode like you can with desktop version so all you can do is estimate with the sliders. The photo is a bit wider than 65:24, I was more following the rule of thirds.I like this 65:24 a lot!
I did not know I had followers!Thanks, true 65:24 is not an available aspect ratio in LR mobile and you cannot add it manually in custom mode like you can with desktop version so all you can do is estimate with the sliders. The photo is a bit wider than 65:24, I was more following the rule of thirds.
I could have done 65:24 jpeg with the camera but by this stage I could hardly feel my fingers (cold wind) and could hardly my shoe laces when changing back at the car.
I suspected you would chirp in when I wrote thatI did not know I had followers!
Out with my newly acquired 14-28mm. Liking It a lot.
View attachment 3541
Yeah, I'm a bit of a fan of ultrawides. I bought the Panasonic wide angle converter set for my Lumix 14mm f2.5 way back, giving about 10.5mm field of view. When the PL 8-18mm f2.8-4 was released, I bought that as soon as they were available. Fantastic lens. One of my favorite ever. Then, when I'd given up hope of Panasonic ever releasing an Ultrawide prime, I bought the Laowa 10mm f2 at release. Of course, a couple of weeks after that, Panasonic announced the PL 9mm f1.7 So I bought that too Now I've got the Lumix S 20-60mm, and for that extra field of view, the 14-28mm Lol. Yeah, you could say I have an addiction. Nearly.Great and fun lens to use.
OMG... at the remains of that VicRail locomotive! Sad end.
This is your best photo yet and in my opinion what UWA is good for. Again IMO UWA is not good for most landscape as it makes everything too small and uninteresting.I think someone might have been getting annoyed with me
View attachment 3557
Again IMO UWA is not good for most landscape as it makes everything too small and uninteresting.
Really? I can't think of anything making you more detached & isolated from your scene, than shooting at 300mm. I love being immersed in it. Being mindful to keep your fingers & toes out of the scene. Being a part of it, but not shown. Ultrawides are brilliant for that. I've not had my S5 & ultrawide long enough to get a reasonable collection of shots, so I'll just post up a few examples from my previous cameras, shot at 16mm equivalent, or thereabouts.I realised this a long time ago pixel peeping UWA photos and seen much more interest within, hence why you'll see me using 300mm for landscape.