And if I understand correctly, no recording to SSD, slower analog shutterspeed.It is a very beautiful camera. But I always thought that for video creation is way more practical to have 2 excellent midrange cameras like the S5iix than just 1, I mean for interviews, podcasts, etc. you need more than just 1 camera, right?
Actually this Leica is like the S5iix with a better evf, a tilt screen (!?) and Cfexpress card slot, but without full anamorphic recording feature.
For that price you can buy 2 Lumix S5iix...
Leica SL3-S Review - First Look | CineD
LEICA SL3-S Review - First Look. We took the new LEICA SL3-S for a spin and came back with a solid opinion. Read more here.www.cined.com
According to the German Leica page, it can record directly to SSD.And if I understand correctly, no recording to SSD, slower analog shutterspeed.
Sorry, I'm very unclear.... I should not do 10 things at the same time. 7 FPS, while the S5ii(X) can do 9 FPS. I understood CF Express instead of SSD, but I might be mistaken.According to the German Leica page, it can record directly to SSD.
What do you mean by "analog" shutter speed? The mechanical shutter of the SL3-S goes down to 1/8000, same as the S5IIx.
I understand. But the S5II(X) can only do AF-S at 9 fps (if that hasn't changed via update and only 7 fps with AF-C in mechanical shutter.Sorry, I'm very unclear.... I should not do 10 things at the same time. 7 FPS, while the S5ii(X) can do 9 FPS. I understood CF Express instead of SSD, but I might be mistaken
I got my data from Petapixel... But yes, I added it to the post before, Gordon Laing states it can use SSD's..I understand. But the S5II(X) can only do AF-S at 9 fps (if that hasn't changed via update and only 7 fps with AF-C in mechanical shutter.
According to the German press text, it can do both. CF Express and SSD.
There will be those who love the Leica brand and will happily purchase the SL3-S regardless of the price. Existing SL users may also see merit in upgrading their older cameras to take advantage of the autofocus and shooting speed improvements. It’s important to remember that the Leica is a perfectly capable camera system and very enjoyable to use. My complaint stems almost solely from the fact that you are paying more than double the price at $5,300 for a camera that is largely identical to the Panasonic S5 IIX in capability. I would take the Panasonic every time. Let’s also consider that the SL3-S is way more expensive than the Nikon Z8, Canon EOS R5 mkII, and Sony A7RV. These cameras which are vastly superior to the SL3-S in so many ways make any sort of logical comparison impossible. As much as I can enjoy using the SL3-S, I can’t think of any situation where I would happily recommend it.
He can't afford one.Chris Nichols’ summary on Petapixel:
Leica's target audience won't be perturbed by such inconveniences as prices. None of Leica's pricing ever made any sense to me - and I used to sell them. They make beautiful cameras.He can't afford one.
Exactly, many people simply don't understand luxury brands including that clueless YouTuber.Leica's target audience won't be perturbed by such inconveniences as prices. None of Leica's pricing ever made any sense to me - and I used to sell them. They make beautiful cameras.