L-Mount will expand further

[RBecker]

The flange distance of E mount is a little bit shorter than L mount and it's only a little bit tighter than L mount. I don't know if impossible, but it's much more difficult than E- to Z-mount, because Z is the shortest and widest of all mirrorless mounts.

You are right, I think there is no chance for E-L adapters! It was a bold move from Nikon to make the Z-mount the shortest and widest. So you can adapt nearly anything and you have a lot of options for design. The only drawback is for their APS-C cameras: Huge mount for small cameras…

 

[Quentinquirelino]

...So you can adapt nearly anything and you have a lot of options for design. ...

I don't think that was their intention behind the Z Mount.

 

[dirk]

The only drawback is for their APS-C cameras: Huge mount for small cameras…

And that is killing any future of Nikon APS-C line. Noone will invest in an APSC system, if it is as big as fullframe with other brands. Nikon seems not be interested in APSC anymore. Since around 10 years.

 

[GeorgeHudetz]

The flange distance of E mount is a little bit shorter than L mount and it's only a little bit tighter than L mount. I don't know if impossible, but it's much more difficult than E- to Z-mount, because Z is the shortest and widest of all mirrorless mounts.

Yes, that's what I seem to recall. The E2Z converter is already quite thin; an E2L might be problematically thin. Perhaps hard to even put a reasonable grip on it? Still, one can hope.