I think that they (Panasonic) might have taken a bit of a look at the G100, and come up with a bit of a plan along those lines, except in 35mm format. The G100 is pretty much universally despised on photography forums, yet Sean Robinson? from Panasonic let slip that it sells ridiculously well (his words) for them, in one of his Lumix live videos feeds. It was also marketed as a video tool. Now why, or how would a technically deficient camera be able to manage that?
Sure, they've modified the formula a little bit -taken away the EVF, but added in IBIS. Taken away autofocus in the pancake, but given us Lumix Lab. I think they've tried to make it a fun camera to play with, and experiment with, rather than a technical tour de force, chasing absolute perfection in video & stills quality. Capable of excellent results, but without costing a fortune.
I'm only throwing a few ideas out there, could be totally wrong, but if they'd already had their @r$es battered over the G100, do you think they'd be up for another round, with an even more expensive offering?