L-MOUNT Forum

Register a free account now!

If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.

Pixelmator purchased by Apple

- Photoshop, LR look decent, but Premiere Pro is subpar in comparison with DaVinci Resolve.
I started out in video with Premier Pro; that was lots of years ago. And then I was very early to adopt ProRes RAW, and then HDR video, and Adobe did not have a clue about any of this. So I moved over to Apple's Final Cut Pro, which handled this very well - it was a breath of fresh air compared to Adobe. Ultimately, like you I've moved to DaVinci Resolve, which I think is the best thing out there. I still use FCP now and then if I want to run native ProRes RAW, but I usually just convert it to ProRes 4444 and run it in Resolve.

But I do use Lightyear for photography. I actually used Photoshop for photography before Lightroom existed, and then grudgingly moved to Lightroom as it became more capable. I do now and then look at other photo-editing software, but so far have not switched to anything else. I use DxO PureRAW as a Lightroom plug-in, mostly with micro four thirds to extend the dynamic range a little, so I appreciate what DxO is doing for photographers. All-in-all I find Lightyear Classic is a good product, well supported, and pretty constantly bringing on new good features.

And by the way, I don't use Lightroom non-classic very much. I have it installed on my Mac and my iPad and my phone. I don't find the interface very intuitive, and the filing system is confusing. I use it now and then in the field with my iPad, but with very few pictures. Maybe it's designed for millennials or younger, but they can have it. I did use it when Adobe first came out with HDR for photography because Lightroom Classic would not display HDR in full screen and non-classic could. But that has been fixed, so I don't have much need for non-classic.

The reason I'm interested in Pixelmator is that it is devoted to just Apple, I use Apple for photography, and with Apple buying them they may get more integrated into Apple's ecosystem, and hence more capable and easier to use. That could be a good thing for me. If you aren't an Apple user I'm sure this is not very interesting. For example if I download Lumix pictures with Lumix Lab into Photos on my phone they will show up in Photos on my Mac and iPad, and I can edit them with Pixelmator with any of these devices. I haven't tried all this, don't know how well it will work, but that is the concept that has me interested.
 
Black Friday 84% offLuminar Neo lifetime subscription is 1999 Turkish Lira or £44.70 so I'm considering this, it looks better than Photomator except for AI masking but that's something I rarely ever use. It has focus stacking and HDR blending from brackets, I'm currently finding out more about it.
 
It has focus stacking and HDR blending from brackets
Keep in mind HDR blending is different than HDR for a high dynamic range monitor. Blending is the old technique of taking a range of exposures and picking the shadows from the higher exposures and the highlights from the lower exposures to give a photo you can display on an 8 bit SD monitor.
 
Back
Top