I can't read Japanese, but the letters haven't changed. So it should still be described as "fast" zoom lens. Why does it now look like a F4? I think a F2 zoom is still a valid opinion. But could also be a compact f2.8. I don't think a F4 would be a specific fast zoom, but maybe a manufacturer who makes a F8 prime does.... It was first described as a “fast” lens, suggesting a 2.8, with some people hoping it might even be a 2.0. Agree, it now looks to be a 4.0. ...
Because it is lower than the first F4 lenses. From top to bottom you have an increased aperture.Why does it now look like a F4?
I was a little surprised that there have announced the entry S9 first, because the lenses on the roadmap didn't fit such a body.
Because it is lower than the first F4 lenses. From top to bottom you have an increased aperture.
I've reed somewhere that more than 80 % of all lens sales are in focal length between 24 and 90 mm or so. Manufacturers have to have the biggest selection in that range.There looks to be lots of overlaps. Do people really buy that many similar lenses?
True, so we will see what happends... I might be interested in the 100-500, if it is small and light and not too expensive....But you have no increase in aperture from top to bottom. The slowest 26/8 is on the same line with the fastest 50/1.4. Also 18-40 f4.5-6.3 is above the faster 14-28 f4-5.6. And that again is above the faster 20-60 f3.5-5.6.
I've reed somewhere that more than 80 % of all lens sales are in focal length between 24 and 90 mm or so. Manufacturers have to have the biggest selection in that range.
but two doesn’t sound many.
In Oberkochen? I was many times in Oberkochen. Good old times with Dr. Nasse and Kornelius Müller. Sad, that this is all over...Ha! I work for Carl Zeiss -
No, Microscopy in Camborne.In Oberkochen? I was many times in Oberkochen. Good old times with Dr. Nasse and Kornelius Müller. Sad, that this is all over...
I would like them to shrink it to 28/2Looks like a 28-70mm F4 and a 100-500mm F?-F?
I expect the 28-70mm to be very compact, otherwise it wouldn't sell against the excellent sigma's.
The 100-500mm looks also interesting, perhaps also reasonable compact?
Then it needs to be very very compact, like pancake-zoom compact. My guess it is that is a foldable design like the Nikon kit lens. Probably for the S9. The 20-60 is already small and light but a way more versatile range, I would never choose a 28-70/4 if same size/weight as the 20-60. On the other hand there is also a 28-70/2.8 from Sigma which is also small & light for its class.A 28-70 F4 would be a perfect zoom... if compact. Since Panasonic already have a Pro 24-70mm F4 I assume this will be a much less expensive non-Pro lens.