I was thinking back and forth today after the experience of Saturday with sports photography.
There have been a few things which bothered me while shooting with the S5ii (I use normally MFT for field hockey) yesterday.
Then I read again the thread here.
Burst speed is 10fps with AFC. for S1RII vs 7fps for S5II
I could have benefitted from higher fps with mechanical shutter yesterday. Maybe I only had a bad day, but I missed some scenes which happened exactly when fps was not high enough to get the best framing inbetween.
Better AF for tracking and improved subject detection
I did not figure out, how to improve it like it was described in the S1Rii autofocus tracking thread.
Constant Preview - M mode half click won't change exposure (this is probably a big one for those who shoot in M mode regularly)
I shoot almost always in M mode. I was not aware that this is different with the S1Rii.
At the same time my hope for a 24MP L-Mount RF style camera shrank dramatically with the whole tarriff desaster.
I do think, that most brands will put new products on hold as long as there is uncertaincy about tarriffs and consumer behaviour. This will last at least til July (the 90 day freeze).
These arguments plus the hope that Panasonic will improve the AF of the S1Rii over the next 2 years with firmware updates, convinced me to push the buy button. I ordered a Lumix S1Rii and hope to get it at the end of this week.
I am guilty. I am weak. The sirenes have been too loud. Time will tell whether this was the right decision for an "anti-40MP" photo only person.
P.S: Maybe they will introduce one day the pixel binning feature of the Leica cameras also to the S1Rii? This L2 cooperation shall not be an one-way road only. This would push the S1Rii in a more positive direction for my use cases. Hope dies last...