- Joined
- Sep 28, 2018
- Messages
- 2,153
There is an article at digitalcameraworld about the success of the Leica Q-series. "The Leica Q series cameras sell twice as much, or even more, than the entire M system" according to Andrea Pacella, Global Marketing Director, Leica Camera.
"The camera (Q3) is expensive, and we prefer to maintain its premium price point instead of overproducing and being forced to lower the price".
An interesting article:
www.digitalcameraworld.com
But this is bad news for us. If the Leica Q is such a success for Leica and therefore so important for their profits, it is very unlikely, that they will allow Panasonic to produce something similar at a lower price point. So, no Lumix Q for us. This is frustrating.
After the introduction of the Leica EV1, probably the same bad news for a RF-style L-Mount Panasonic body model with interchangeable lenses.
Life is unfair...
"The camera (Q3) is expensive, and we prefer to maintain its premium price point instead of overproducing and being forced to lower the price".
An interesting article:
What is Leica's best-selling camera? I found out the answer and was completely shocked
Forget rangefinders! Leica's most successful camera range isn't the one you'd ever expect
But this is bad news for us. If the Leica Q is such a success for Leica and therefore so important for their profits, it is very unlikely, that they will allow Panasonic to produce something similar at a lower price point. So, no Lumix Q for us. This is frustrating.
After the introduction of the Leica EV1, probably the same bad news for a RF-style L-Mount Panasonic body model with interchangeable lenses.
Life is unfair...