Hi all, we have a trip coming up and I'm considering lenses for handheld landscapes. I was watching Lumix 14 - 28 thread with interest as I'd identified it as the solution but on reflection had to remind myself I sold a 10 - 20 APS-C as it was little used due to its size. The Lumix 20 - 60 on my Sigma fp L would be great, I think 20mm is wide enough and I like the images at 20mm...but the lens is too big. I'm looking for a form factor not far off the fp L with the Sigma 45mm as I like to carry the fp L and my Leica CL. So options are limited...considering the 18 - 40 as the only zoom option - I looked at the image thread https://l-mount-forum.com/community/threads/lumix-s-18-40mm-f-4-5-6-3.751/, but I'd regret if it doesn't match the 20 - 60 IQ, which seems to be the case. Can anyone comment further on the 18 - 40, or recommend a prime that might fit the bill and double as every day carry? Or I just leave the Leica CL at home and pack the 20 - 60 for walks. Thanks
L-MOUNT Forum
Register a free account now!
If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.
Compact lens for landscapes
- Thread starter andy3009
- Start date
When I bought my fp L I chose the Sigma 24mm f/3.5 to go with it, and it remains my favourite (along with the 35mm f/2) two years on. It has the same sort of pleasant character as the 45/2.8 although it's sharper wide open at close distances and has a 0.5x maximum magnification.
Some posts with photos from when I first got the camera and lens: May 2023 1, May 2023 2, May 2023 3, July 2023
Some posts with photos from when I first got the camera and lens: May 2023 1, May 2023 2, May 2023 3, July 2023
Thanks @Pete_W the video is useful especially the comparison with the 45mm at the end, quite convincing for my scenario. @xaviergut I've been considering that lens, IQ looks good, just wondered if it might be too wide to double as an every day carry.
Yes, I see your point, I don't know if the Sigma FP L has an apsc mode (I guess so). In that case it would become a 25,5mm focal lenght, right? And still some megapixels to crop again...
I own the Sigma 24mm f3.5 and is aswell tiny and a good performer. If I need to shoot wider with it I take two or three pictures and then I merge them in Lightroom.
I have the 17/4 as well (it was the second of the i-series lenses I bought, just after it'd been released) and I'd agree that it's probably too wide as an every day carry lens. It's really great at what it does, though: I've used it to photograph churches without the usual perspective distortion - at the cost of chopping off the bottom third of the image: September 2023, August 2023
And some more conventional wide angle photos: September 2023
sergun80
Well-Known Member
I had a Sigma 17/4 for several months (on a Sony camera). This is a great little fix if you need such focal points.
Travis Butler
Well-Known Member
I don't know if you'd be open to adapting, but if you are you can find some very small film-era lenses. Here's a comparison shot of some 35-70 film lenses I like alongside the Lumix 20-60:
Two I'd point out in particular: The Minolta MD 35-70/3.5 Macro next to the 20-60 is a very high quality lens and works very well on my Sigma fp; I used it extensively on my trip to DC last year, for example, and captured other favorite photos like this:
20231118-SDIM8265 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
And if you want one of the smallest zooms I've ever used, the Olympus OM Zuiko 35-70/3.5-4.5 at the right of the lineup hasn't wow'ed me quite as much as the Minolta, but still does pretty respectably:
20250417-SDIM3658 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
(Took this one today as a sample for you; the lighting wasn't great, but it at least shows a reasonable look at the technical capabilities of the lens.)
And if you want something wider, my favorite OM Zuiko 24/2.8 weighs practically nothing and is very small - another test pic from today:
20250417-SDIM3674 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Not sure how well it'd perform on the higher-res sensor on the fp L, but on the fp you can read the railroad crossing signs if you click through to the original pic and view at 100%.
- Apple - iPhone 13 mini
- iPhone 13 mini back dual wide camera 5.1mm f/1.6
- 5.1 mm
- ƒ/1.6
- 1/121 sec
- Pattern
- Auto exposure
- ISO 50
Two I'd point out in particular: The Minolta MD 35-70/3.5 Macro next to the 20-60 is a very high quality lens and works very well on my Sigma fp; I used it extensively on my trip to DC last year, for example, and captured other favorite photos like this:
20231118-SDIM8265 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
And if you want one of the smallest zooms I've ever used, the Olympus OM Zuiko 35-70/3.5-4.5 at the right of the lineup hasn't wow'ed me quite as much as the Minolta, but still does pretty respectably:
20250417-SDIM3658 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
(Took this one today as a sample for you; the lighting wasn't great, but it at least shows a reasonable look at the technical capabilities of the lens.)
And if you want something wider, my favorite OM Zuiko 24/2.8 weighs practically nothing and is very small - another test pic from today:
20250417-SDIM3674 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Not sure how well it'd perform on the higher-res sensor on the fp L, but on the fp you can read the railroad crossing signs if you click through to the original pic and view at 100%.
Pete_W
LMF-Patron
If I had to select one, it would be the 18-40mm because the focal range is more versatile. The Sigma contemporary lenses are all sharper, but I would find a single focal length a bit too limiting, personally.
Good idea @Travis Butler but I'd prefer AF. You reminded me I have a Tamron 24mm that I've used on both the fp L and the CL, so I can check those images - although the lens has fungus so it's fuzzy in places...I have an old K mount 35 - something that I may try one day. @Pete_W thanks for the reply, I may have time to try an 18 - 40, I'd kind of dismissed it but it's becoming more appealing.