pdk42
Moderator
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2022
- Messages
- 2,211
Maybe I was unlucky, but despite trying three copies of the 28-200, I found its IQ to be disappointing. I’m hoping the 20-200 is better. I can live without the OIS.
L-MOUNT Forum
Register a free account now!
If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.
News Sigma 20-200mm f3.5/6.3 DG
- Thread starter xaviergut
- Start date
Jan.Wedekind
LMF-Patron
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2023
- Messages
- 131
Well, it's not a prime obviously but I haven't noticed a strong difference from the 24-105mm but I am also not doing anything technical to say for sure. For general friends & family & travel it was perfectly fine so far and I was happily surprised by the nice out-of-focus rendering. Obviously it's slow but on the plus side, the stabilization is practically as good as with the 24-105mm, which means at least for static subjects, it'll do just fine at quite long exposures.
But as you said, maybe just unlucky! Also have to say that I am usually more at the long end – I suspect you're more on the wide end?
But as you said, maybe just unlucky! Also have to say that I am usually more at the long end – I suspect you're more on the wide end?
Hello,
A Smash link with two photos, one at 20mm and the other at 200mm. You need to unzip them. The 20-200mm lens has more distortion at 20mm than the Panasonic 20-60mm. The processing is a bit aggressive at 20mm...
Available for one week :
fromsmash.com
A Smash link with two photos, one at 20mm and the other at 200mm. You need to unzip them. The 20-200mm lens has more distortion at 20mm than the Panasonic 20-60mm. The processing is a bit aggressive at 20mm...
Available for one week :
Test sigma 20-200 - 121.24 Mo
2 fichiers envoyés via Smash, un service français, sécurisé et responsable d’envoi de (super) gros fichiers.
fromsmash.com