L-MOUNT Forum

Register a free account now!

If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.

Panasonic 24-60 f2.8

Seeing all the positive reactions to the 24 - 60 has me tempted, too. I love my 24 - 70 S Pro, but if the 24 - 60 is optically equivalent while similar in terms of weather-sealing etc., I don't mind losing a bit on the long end considering how much smaller and lighter the 24-60 is. Easy decision, right? It would be, if it wasn't for the filter thread!

I mainly use the Sigma 35mm F1.2 and then the S Pro, which both share a filter thread diameter. Now the 24 - 60 has a smaller diameter and, considering how chaotic I am, I am not sure if I can keep filters for two sizes of threads organised, hehe.

I guess I'll wait and see. Firstly if long term impressions of the 24 - 60 continue to be positive. And then, secondly, if Sigma's 35mm F1.2 II might come with a smaller filter thread, considering the CEO already confirmed it will be smaller and lighter than the first version while optically better.
 
Seeing all the positive reactions to the 24 - 60 has me tempted, too. I love my 24 - 70 S Pro, but if the 24 - 60 is optically equivalent while similar in terms of weather-sealing etc., I don't mind losing a bit on the long end considering how much smaller and lighter the 24-60 is. Easy decision, right? It would be, if it wasn't for the filter thread!

I mainly use the Sigma 35mm F1.2 and then the S Pro, which both share a filter thread diameter. Now the 24 - 60 has a smaller diameter and, considering how chaotic I am, I am not sure if I can keep filters for two sizes of threads organised, hehe.

I guess I'll wait and see. Firstly if long term impressions of the 24 - 60 continue to be positive. And then, secondly, if Sigma's 35mm F1.2 II might come with a smaller filter thread, considering the CEO already confirmed it will be smaller and lighter than the first version while optically better.
Perhaps picking up a good quality step up ring will help. I do that between my 77mm and 82mm lenses.
 
Seeing all the positive reactions to the 24 - 60 has me tempted, too. I love my 24 - 70 S Pro, but if the 24 - 60 is optically equivalent while similar in terms of weather-sealing etc., I don't mind losing a bit on the long end considering how much smaller and lighter the 24-60 is. Easy decision, right? It would be, if it wasn't for the filter thread!

I mainly use the Sigma 35mm F1.2 and then the S Pro, which both share a filter thread diameter. Now the 24 - 60 has a smaller diameter and, considering how chaotic I am, I am not sure if I can keep filters for two sizes of threads organised, hehe.

I guess I'll wait and see. Firstly if long term impressions of the 24 - 60 continue to be positive. And then, secondly, if Sigma's 35mm F1.2 II might come with a smaller filter thread, considering the CEO already confirmed it will be smaller and lighter than the first version while optically better.
No need, for a smaller filter thread just use a step down ring.. you could keep it attached to the front filter thread of the 24-60 and job done.
 
Yeah, I didn't even consider using a ring because, I think I once had a "flexible" ring that was supposed to allow me to cover several thread diameters with just one ring and that was a huge hassle because getting that thing onto my lenses just wasn't easy. Then again that was probably 5 or 6 years ago when I had my G9...
But if it's just about moving between 82 and 77, I think I could manage!
 
Yeah, I didn't even consider using a ring because, I think I once had a "flexible" ring that was supposed to allow me to cover several thread diameters with just one ring and that was a huge hassle because getting that thing onto my lenses just wasn't easy. Then again that was probably 5 or 6 years ago when I had my G9...
But if it's just about moving between 82 and 77, I think I could manage!
Also, buy a good quality brass ring and pay extra for quality. I know it's tempting to buy a $15 Chinese ring from amazon, but you do get what you pay for here, IMO. The aluminum ones tend to go out of round slightly and can get stuck on your lens or not fit well from the start. I bit the bullet and bought a B&W brass filter and it's as smooth as silk, going on and off. Enjoy your new toy.
 
what a huge box for the lens though, exact the same size as the 70-300 box, just a different color (now grey). Shall we post pictures in a new lens sample thread ?

I'm working from home now, and it is so tempting to just play with it :cool: . But feels good on the S5ii.
 
Speaking about filter threads... Do any of you know this internal magnetic clip in filters from Kolari? They have them for Sony E mount, Nikon Z, Canon RF and Fujifilm cameras.

Would be anyone interested in such filters for L-mount cameras?


 
Speaking about filter threads... Do any of you know this internal magnetic clip in filters from Kolari? They have them for Sony E mount, Nikon Z, Canon RF and Fujifilm cameras.

Would be anyone interested in such filters for L-mount cameras?



I would really like to find a good magnetic solution, but the one's I've tried were marginal in their performance. Weak magnets and caps falling off in my bag were more of an annoyance than a functional benefit. Polarpro has a locking magnet design that looks cool, but I haven't dug in on the details. I just saw a quick FB ad about it.
 
I was looking at Urth magnetic filter solution. They are compatible with K&F Concept if I’m not mistaken. The magnetic lens cap solution is not what I’m looking for though. Normal lens cap can’t be used? Or only directly to the filter on top op the magnetic ring.

But anyway, I would love to continue this in a filter thread.

Maybe someone can move these last few messages on filters to a separate thread.
 
I would really like to find a good magnetic solution, but the one's I've tried were marginal in their performance.
Weak magnets and caps falling off in my bag were more of an annoyance than a functional benefit.....
Personally I should avoid all kinds of magnetic accessories. As it can have a negative influence to "electro magnetic" interference.
In past, in "ancient" digital development of digital photography, this was just one of the errors that camera brands got involved,
and was not taken into account in advance when developing digital systems.
Systems by Fuji and Kodak couldn’t be used at all "professionally", by these not foreseen problems.

Now "after years" having more young developers, seems to have forgotten these problems and "basic" rules,
by understanding system development. By simple avoiding problems by "electromagnetic" interference.

(Digital photographic experience over about 35 years).
 
Last edited:
I'm no spring chicken, and remember the days of managing both static charges and electromagnetic interference.

I used the magnetic caps and filters for over three years with absolutely no problem other than my caps coming off too easily. Lol.
 
Seeing all the positive reactions to the 24 - 60 has me tempted, too. I love my 24 - 70 S Pro, but if the 24 - 60 is optically equivalent while similar in terms of weather-sealing etc., I don't mind losing a bit on the long end considering how much smaller and lighter the 24-60 is. Easy decision, right? It would be, if it wasn't for the filter thread!

I mainly use the Sigma 35mm F1.2 and then the S Pro, which both share a filter thread diameter. Now the 24 - 60 has a smaller diameter and, considering how chaotic I am, I am not sure if I can keep filters for two sizes of threads organised, hehe.

I guess I'll wait and see. Firstly if long term impressions of the 24 - 60 continue to be positive. And then, secondly, if Sigma's 35mm F1.2 II might come with a smaller filter thread, considering the CEO already confirmed it will be smaller and lighter than the first version while optically better.

PetaPixel has just posted a review of the Lumix 24-60mm:

 
Back
Top