I'm not trying to be a whinger (esp since I love the S1Rii), but 1.3 does very, very little for the photographers amongst us. Basically, it's this:
- minor operational tweak for ISO control
- addition of status indicator for constant preview
- different style eye detect focus box (square not crosshairs)
That's It! I appreciate it's a lot more for videographers, but from my perspective it's really almost nothing.
Not true! The AF improvements are real. While I am not a good enough action photographer to post numbers, it seems fairly evident to me that the keeper rate has gone up on my practice shots recently of geese (in-flight), dogs, and even a hawk.
And, the addition of the slower SH frame rate is very welcome as well.
I also think they fixed a bug where if you had shot two or three very short SH bursts back-to-back, such that the buffer filled with the last burst, it used to take much longer to clear the buffer than one equivalent burst. Now, it takes the same amount of time to clear the buffer, regardless of whether you used one long burst or several shorter bursts. That was seriously annoying.
I think Richard also said the processing time for hi-res shots has gone down.
It is true, of course, that these improvements (other than the HR mode improvements) will only help wildlife/sports shooters, but those problems really did tarnish the S1II* bodies’ ability to be taken seriously by action photographers, IMO.
I do wonder what they are thinking about for 2.0 (assuming there is one). Perhaps we should start a thread/survey on what stills shooters would want out of 2.0. And a parallel thread for videographers, of course.