GeorgeHudetz
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2023
- Messages
- 745
Yes, I think we of a similar mind here. And yes, the Sigma 105 macro is one of those lenses."Great Lenses" (TM) produce images that have a subtle look/feel to them that lifts them above the mundane. A sort of feeling that a veil has been lifted from our eyes and suddenly the world is sharper and more vivid. It's not just resolving capability, but about the contrast across the fine details. I think "micro-contrast" is as good a way to describe it as anything else. Sometimes careful PP can make up for slightly inferior lenses, but it depends on the scene.
My Sigma 100mm macro I class as a "Great Lens". It's just uber, uber sharp with oodles of fine resolution and punchy contrast. My Sigma 35/2 get darned close to "Great Lens" too but it lags the 100mm by a smidgeon.
Amongst my zooms, the only one that gets close is the 70-200 f4 S-Pro. I can't say that I'm unhappy with the others I have (14-28, 24-105, 20-60), but they are just not quite at the same level.
From what I’ve read, the Leica 90-280 has that “Great Look” in spades. It’s huge, but, on the other hand, only 100g heavier than the S-Pro F2.8 with a 1.4x teleconverter. And I hate teleconverters - just don’t like thinking about when I should take them off, put them on, etc.
