L-MOUNT Forum

Register a free account now!

If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.

Kalamazoo Air Zoo

Travis Butler

Well-Known Member
Was getting late by the time the last pics finished exporting, so just going to post a couple of teaser pics to start with... full set of 270 pics is here:


54630035654_7ef17321d8_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5616 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Sigma fp, TTArtisan 11/2.8 Fisheye

The Air Zoo was founded by Suzanne and Pete Parish, using planes they started collecting starting in 1959. Suzanne was a WASP in World War II, and the P-40 was the plane "she had always dreamed of flying"; when she had a chance to grab one, she jumped on it. And here it is hanging in the museum's atrium. :cool:

54630035584_087c94120a_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5642 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Minolta MD 35-70/3.5 Macro

I mentioned in the Henry Ford Museum thread that the Tin Goose was in a real sense 'my' airplane, the first one I was able to recognize as a little kid; it's neat that the Air Zoo has one as well. :)

Alas, it was also when I started really picking up flaws with my old favorite Olympus OM Zuiko 24/2.8:

54630050443_f937310def_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5634 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
OM Zuiko 24/2.8

Indoors, in a dimly lit environment with heavy spotlighting, it flares like crazy. I switched to the Minolta, which does much better, but has a much tighter FoV. :(

I had an unexpected chance to stop by again on my way home, and went back in with my Konica Hexanon 28/3.5; that one worked out better in both respects.

54630049218_6e4e72fae0_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6790 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Hexanon 28/3.5 (8-element version)
 
The Air Zoo has four main settings.

The 'main' room is overall dim with spotlights, so has a lot of problems with both light levels and glare:

54628963932_4908528ff1_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5880 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
(Had to boost the brightness a lot in PP; I was once again impressed with how well the fp does in low light, almost everything in here was ISO 1600 or above, with several at ISO 6400.)

There's the World War II room, which is much better lit but still has a lot of problems with glare:

54630135785_4350ff4d55_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5721 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

There's the 'space' room, which is sort of in between:

54630135605_050b4b71a1_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5785 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

(I give them credit for effort, especially since they're not a dedicated space museum, but there's not a lot there that's unique; it's almost all replicas and stuff like an Iron Man armor replica.)

All these are on the main campus. There's also the museum's original home building, which is now the Zoo's restoration shop, but which also houses some exhibits:

54630049673_cf7a079d7f_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6569 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

It's not as big as the Henry Ford, but there's still a lot to go through. I did several hours at the main building on the first visit; squeezed in an hour at the restoration hangar on the second visit; and when I had a chance for a third visit, I went back to re-shoot with the Hexanon 28/3.5 as I mentioned above, plus pick up some exhibits I passed up the first time.
 
How could I go without some more beauty shots of my founding plane?

54629832601_ae3ef057cb_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5646 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
MD 35-70

54630050398_cd15bc3b87_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5647 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Some flare, but more attractive to me than the OM 24/2.8's.

54628964992_a09b8f6f82_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5655 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Unlike the Henry Ford, the Air Zoo had good shooting angles for most of the way around the plane.

54630034724_20e99b2b2a_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5894 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

As well as a decent top view.

54630049208_96acfe63d1_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6794 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Hexanon 28/3.5

54630049093_3a97e1f547_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6809 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
 

Attachments

  • 54630034724_20e99b2b2a_b.jpg
    EXIF
    54630034724_20e99b2b2a_b.jpg
    215.9 KB · Views: 2
The North American Aviation B-25 is another old friend:

54630050448_7723022341_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5627 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Just as the B-24 was produced in Willow Run, the B-25 was produced in Kansas City, building around 2/3 of the total planes at a plant at Fairfax Airport. (Although the airport was closed 40 years ago, with a GM assembly plant built over it, you can still see the runways in a satellite photo today.)

54628964967_f7f1eeebcc_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5673 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

There were a lot of B-25 variants. It was hard to call some of them 'bombers' at all; one version had a big 75mm cannon mounted in the nose, replacing the bombardier's position. This was a milder version, with 8 machine guns in the nose instead of the cannon.

54628964982_702aca9f60_b.jpg20250526-SDIM5668 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54630135355_2e8a5458e0_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5855 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
(You can see their P-38 scale model flying in the background.)

54630049458_eab2ac46f4_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5891 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

They did really pack the planes together at the Air Zoo, which made it hard to get photos... but I'll admit they did a better presentation than the Strategic Air & Space:

54385538690_b294172d25_b.jpg
20240902-SDIM2416 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
(One of the bomber versions, with the glass nose for the bombardier.)

54630034294_31b2f08e4a_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6831 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
I mentioned in the Willow Run posts that other museums had tributes to Rosie the Riveter; the bit in the lower-right is the kind of thing I've seen most places, which is why I was so impressed by Willow Run's Rosie exhibit.

54628964987_6760128f38_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5661 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

...you don't think it's jealous of the attention the Tomcat got in Top Gun, do you?
 
Ah, yes, the F-14.

54628963732_6153277be1_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6822 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

I do wonder sometimes what's up with the Tomcat. Was it just Top Gun?

54630135395_a16661f5e2_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5847 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Because even though it has a very distinctive look:

54630049733_79dc0ff843_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5871 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Its actual service record wasn't all that distinguished. A competent plane, but not the kind of success that, say, the F-86 Sabre was, or the F-4 Phantom. The early production engines were problematic and it didn't get a really good engine until the 80s. The missile it was designed to carry, the Phoenix, was kind of a one-trick pony and was never actually successful in combat for the USAF. (Though the Iranians did use it.) It was complicated and required a lot of maintenance.

54630035004_9852eb9976_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5842 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

But still the Tomcat got (and gets) a lot of attention. A few years ago, there was a question on Quora suggesting the US make a deal with Iran to get some of their F-14s back for display, since it claimed there were only 3-4 available. Which was wrong on the face of it - Wikipedia lists dozens on display - but it shows how attached some people got to it. It was used by the anime Macross as the inspiration for the transforming Veritech fighters.

54630134575_eeb3a2bbeb_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6840 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

I can't say I'm immune, either, as I thought it was cool as a kid. (Though the F-104 Starfighter was and remains my standard for 'cool fighter'; we'll get to it later.)

54630034209_cc2fd5593d_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6853 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54628963562_50431bf878_b.jpg20250531-SDIM6863 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
(One of the few angles where I couldn't get a clear shot of it; kudos to the Air Zoo for keeping the sight lines open.)

I dunno. It certainly gets star billing at the Air Zoo.

54630134915_1b9d608b53_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5878 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
 
As a side note - and to peek ahead a bit - I've been here twice before, but this was the first time I really felt satisfied with the technical quality of the pics. See this pic from 2013, and compare it to this visit:

54632852497_fd20f030de_b.jpg
20130615-IMGP1036 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Pentax K-01, DA 18-55

54629831276_a9243f2d3b_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6883 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Sigma fp, Hexanon 28/3.5

Or this even earlier pic from 2000:
IMG_0095.JPG
  • OLYMPUS OPTICAL CO.,LTD - C2020Z
  • 6.6 mm
  • Æ’/2
  • 1/30 sec
  • Pattern
  • ISO 200

Olympus C-2020

54630135685_87731162dc_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5757 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Sigma fp, MD 35-70
 
A few of the non-warbird planes. See here for more background:


54630134725_39e27467e1_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6799 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
I like this little racer. :) Not as extreme as the GeeBee, but still coming from the minimalist concept.

54630050383_11939fc648_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5654 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54630035529_ecbecd64e8_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5653 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
This Waco biplane was a tricky one, with the dark fuselage and the dark-and-spotlight exposure.

54628963787_7bd4b34d76_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6800 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Waco gets several representations here.

54630034369_1292306801_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6806 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54630034379_5cb8899e76_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6803 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
Birds in flight!

54630049113_d8b721f902_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6812 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54630134760_208a1d6e3b_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6787 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
 
  • Love
Reactions: PJD
They also put some odd stuff in the restoration hangar that didn't really fit in the main exhibit hall. Like the front part of a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior...

54628963897_42e4ba2a7a_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6641 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

...but only the front part.

54630134835_668e273de7_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6643 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Or the nozzle from a NERVA nuclear rocket engine prototype:

54630049453_9bbaf5ee02_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6583 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

How about one of the giant F-1 engines from the Saturn V rocket?

54630135160_631c148b5f_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6586 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54630049553_5a8e27b77a_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6587 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

But I think what took the cake for me were two of the largest and most complicated aviation piston engines ever built.

The Wright R-3350 Turbo-Compound, used in the B-29 (where it got a reputation for trouble) and later in the DC-7 and Lockheed Constellation:

54630049703_3b019d368a_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6556 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

This was gnarly enough - compare it to the classic Merlin engine used in the Spitfire and Mustang:

54630049268_580c771783_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6648 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

But it was nothing compared to the Pratt & Whitney R-4360 Wasp Major:

54629831841_d74123837a_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6561 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54630034519_3aff654d6b_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6564 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

This monster powered the giant B-36 bomber:

54017856158_47916669cd_b.jpg
20240902-SDIM2385 by Travis Butler, on Flickr (from the Strategic Air & Space Museum)

where it also developed a reputation for trouble, in this case a nasty habit of catching fire.

As impressively big and complicated as they were, they proved to be the end of the line; there was a limit to how much power you could coax out of a piston engine, and newer jet and turboprop engines could scale to much higher power levels while actually being simpler.

Though they didn't always seem simpler... take a look at the J-58 engine for the SR-71 Blackbird:

54630034819_625a509e65_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6578 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
 
A Pair of Lockheeds

54628963847_ea1b7ba875_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6645 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The F-104 Starfighter is another of my (slightly older) childhood favorite planes:

54630049163_ed7dbeb9cf_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6588 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

It was slender, sleek, minimalist, a finely-honed stiletto compared to the brute force of the F-14 Tomcat.

54630034544_752a22fbae_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6635 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54629831586_7dc1892158_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6634 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The F-117 Nighthawk was the opposite of the F-104 in a different way:

54630049383_df282d7dae_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6596 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Not sleek or slender at all, but ungainly, lumpy, all sharp angles and chunky points.

54630049423_b0b55724cf_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6592 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54630034654_7ec12eeb88_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6619 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54630134925_f5797c50b9_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6625 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Still, I can't help liking it in a weird, awkward way.

54630049428_36390e8710_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6600 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

A study in contrasts.
 
On a related note, my youngest sister (on the left) works for a company in southern California that manufactures drones. They had their annual company picnic this past weekend, and she sent me this "OK to share" snapshot.
company-picnic-drone.jpg
 
On a related note, my youngest sister (on the left) works for a company in southern California that manufactures drones. They had their annual company picnic this past weekend, and she sent me this "OK to share" snapshot.
View attachment 13811
Heh. Nice.

Would people here be interested in a general 'Post your favorite aerospace pics' thread? Or maybe a 'Post your favorite transportation pics', so we can include @Pete_W 's trains?
 
I may have mentioned before, my office is on Kelly Johnson Parkway, and I have friends that work at Skunkworks. So I'm a Lockheed fan by osmosis.
Oh, nice. I'll bet they've got lots of great stories... hopefully some of them can even be told. Teufel Grinsend Schwanz

Another one of their products is coming up later, Blackbird flying in the dead of night...
 
Rivals

54628964127_00745681a6_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6604 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The F-86:
54628964152_b20f0bb4e0_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6605 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The MiG-15:
54630049333_78e4bd406d_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6607 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

There were many great fighter rivalries in history; this pair is the one that took things into the jet age.

I always thought the Sabre looked a little better-balanced than the MiG; the tail on the MiG always looked a little outsized.

54630135095_1d263e5335_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6603 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

That said, it looks a little tubby compared to the MiG.

54628964022_696b3c1d8f_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6608 by Travis Butler, on Flickr
 
The Menagerie
So, did "Air Zoo" sound like a weird name for an aviation museum? A few years after they started, the founders noticed how many of the planes had animal-themed names, and decided to start calling it the zoo.

The prior post has the "Mallard" seaplane, and we've already talked about the Ford Trimotor being nicknamed the "Tin Goose." We saw the Curtiss Robin earlier, and the founders' pink P-40 Warhawk:
54629831526_4d28119a1e_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6774 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

There's also the Sopwith Camel:
54630034464_ab1bdea2a9_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6782 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The C-47 Skytrain, better known as the DC-3 - but also nicknamed the "Gooney Bird":
54630050023_d88111b047_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5773 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The P-39 Airacobra:
54628963717_f2928e32fe_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6835 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

AH-1J SeaCobra:
54630135905_58a278b216_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5677 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

A-4 Skyhawk:
54630134460_4f106dd105_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6874 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

F/A-18 Hornet:
54630048948_5c2855c4fc_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6870 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

But probably the most famous set is in the next post...
 
From its start in 1929, up to its merger with Northrup, the Grumman Corporation made a name for itself building rugged, powerful airplanes, particularly carrier planes for the US Navy. They also built amphibious planes like the Mallard above; the Lunar Module, and others. But they're most famous for the 'Cat' run of carrier-based fighters.

The F4F Wildcat, later built by General Motors as the FM-2 after Grumman had moved on the F6F:
54630135880_1793b3ceb7_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5702 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54629832471_ea855afdb6_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5705 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The F6F Hellcat:
54629832476_edac74acce_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5703 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54628964827_e3bbe20256_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5709 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

F7F Tigercat:
(The Zoo used to have one, but sadly sold it.)

F8F Bearcat:
(Same story with the Zoo having one and later selling it.)

F9F Cougar:
54630049438_83e7e901ac_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6623 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

F11F Tiger:
54629831566_07f94f66f8_b.jpg
20250530-SDIM6638 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

And, of course, the F-14 Tomcat above.
 
The Air Zoo used to host a pretty fun hot-air balloon festival every summer. Nothing to rival Albuquerque, obviously, but pretty well-attended nonetheless. It's since moved a few miles away to a neighboring farm as the area around The Zoo has built up and grown more "urban," for lack of a better word.
 
Restoration

Back in the restoration shop, we saw them working on one of the Lake Michigan rescues... here's a look at the final result.

54630135650_449e8ef23f_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5754 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The Willow Run display showed what the SBD Dauntless looked like at the bottom of the lake; the Zoo's pic above showed what it looked like as it was lifted out of the water. This is what it looked like in fighting trim.

54628964682_e0978f7a98_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5748 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The plane was remarkably well-preserved, but that doesn't mean perfectly preserved:

54630135705_34bd558b3c_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5750 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

54630034004_afc28fa375_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6932 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Although Douglas Aircraft made its name with the famous DC-3, and continued a famous line of passenger planes through its merger with McDonnell Aircraft, it was also a notable Navy supplier, the SBD Dauntless being one of its more notable planes. (The A-4 Skyhawk above was another of its successes.)

54630048763_5323d982d6_b.jpg
20250531-SDIM6929 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The Dauntless was already getting a bit outdated when it made its name at the Battle of Midway; its common nickname was "Slow But Deadly." But it was well-loved, especially compared to its replacement, the generally disliked SB2C Helldiver.

Douglas later got the chance to follow up and do the job right with the AD-4 Skyraider:

54630035314_6780c121d1_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5739 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

Although it was a bit too late to fly in WWII, the Skyraider went on to have a notable career in Korea and Vietnam; 20 years was a very long time for a piston plane to stick around, which makes it kind of special.

54630135750_309fc65087_b.jpg
20250526-SDIM5742 by Travis Butler, on Flickr

The pics don't quite convey just how big it is. (It doesn't help that I couldn't get a side view; the wings block the rear fuselage from this angle.)

Douglas_AD-1Q_Skyraider_VC-35.jpgSome versions carried up to four people for radar or electronic countermeasure work. A couple even had a passenger compartment inside the fuselage. It's amazing that they were able to make something that big fly with just a single engine.
 
Back
Top