robin0112358
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2023
- Messages
- 262
Thanks. The Contax Zeiss lenses are unsurpassed IMO. Not even by Leica and certainly not for the price!Rather liking the dreamy look of the second image! Quite the contrast to the incredibly crisp first image. Looks like a nice lens.
I've not used them but certainly very impressed with what you posted. Partial to some old Pentax lenses myself, esp the 31/77 FA Limiteds. But sadly lots of other people are too, so bargains are not to be had....Thanks. The Contax Zeiss lenses are unsurpassed IMO. Not even by Leica and certainly not for the price!
I've not used them but certainly very impressed with what you posted. Partial to some old Pentax lenses myself, esp the 31/77 FA Limiteds. But sadly lots of other people are too, so bargains are not to be had....
3801 heading north by Peter Watters, on FlickrThank you Paul.Some beautiful colours off that FpL.
I've been busy with lots of non-photo stuff, but here are a couple I did last week. Both with the S5. First with the 14-28, second with the 70-300.
View attachment 776
As Evening Falls by Paul Kaye, on Flickr
View attachment 777
Summer Field by Paul Kaye, on Flickr
Really good George. What tracker did you use? Isn't Engineer Pass kind of gnarley to get up that high? And I'd expect pretty cold at 1:00 AM.Milky Way, photographed from the top of Engineer Pass in Colorado. 12,800 feet, about 1:00 am, in June.
Thanks, Charles.Really good George. What tracker did you use? Isn't Engineer Pass kind of gnarley to get up that high? And I'd expect pretty cold at 1:00 AM.
I've done Milky Way shots from Haleakala, but that's only 10,000 feet, and 20 degrees latitude, and it was still cold.