Interactive L-Mount Lens Table

[pdk42]

Nice table. Thanks. I think the TTArtisan list is this:

- 11mm f2.8 fisheye
- 50mm f1.4 tilt
- 500mm f6.3
- 50mm f2 pancake
- 100mm f2.8 macro
- 35mm T2.1 cine lens
- 50mm f1.4
- 90mm f1.5
- 75mm f2 AF
- 100mm f2.8 T/S

They used to do a 21mm f1.5 but it's now discontinued.

 

[Jan.Wedekind]

No time yet to add the TTArtisan lenses but I have added a view interactive charts: https://www.endlesslycurious.net/posts/lens-charts/

You can explore the following:

• Lens Releases by Year and Brand
• Lens Distribution by Category and Brand
• Focal Length vs Aperture Range
• Focal Length vs Price
• Focal Length vs Weight
• Lens Distribution by Brand (Pie Chart)

Charts are interactive, so you can filter, zoom, etc.

If anyone has good ideas for a different type of visualization based on the lens data, just let me know

Example screenshot:

 

[SWRick]

Someone commented that the Panasonic 18mm 1.8 is categorized as Wide Angle rather than UWA. I think it is a matter of definition; I would consider it UWA, but mileage varies.
And thanks for the continuing refinements!

 

[Jan.Wedekind]

Someone commented that the Panasonic 18mm 1.8 is categorized as Wide Angle rather than UWA. I think it is a matter of definition; I would consider it UWA, but mileage varies.

Good catch! Was definitely wrong, fixed it now

 

[Jan.Wedekind]

Never really noticed that Panasonic’s lens distribution overall skews slightly cheaper than Sigma. I guess it just pushes to show that they have not done any “Pro” glass for quite a while. Will be interesting to see if this will get rectified or if they leave the more expensive segments to Sigma and Leica. Would be odd since I would naively guess that those lenses have higher margins?

 

[Jan.Wedekind]

Nice table. Thanks. I think the TTArtisan list is this:

- 11mm f2.8 fisheye
- 50mm f1.4 tilt
- 500mm f6.3
- 50mm f2 pancake
- 100mm f2.8 macro
- 35mm T2.1 cine lens
- 50mm f1.4
- 90mm f1.5
- 75mm f2 AF
- 100mm f2.8 T/S

They used to do a 21mm f1.5 but it's now discontinued.

All added now

 

[pdk42]

All added now

Great. This is a great resource you've built.

Small editing suggestion - TTArtisan is not plural. But you've used "TTArtisans" in the selection criteria.

 

[pdk42]

Never really noticed that Panasonic’s lens distribution overall skews slightly cheaper than Sigma. I guess it just pushes to show that they have not done any “Pro” glass for quite a while. Will be interesting to see if this will get rectified or if they leave the more expensive segments to Sigma and Leica. Would be odd since I would naively guess that those lenses have higher margins?


View attachment 14082

Interesting comparison. I'm actually a big fan of Lumix lenses. Setting aside some poor experiences with copy variation, I find their performance to be more than adequate and the prices are reasonable. In fact, apart from the 28-200 (which even after trying three copies I still found to be underwhelming), there isn't a Lumix lens that isn't a great performer - whether Pro or not.